Dana Ali – WNN SOAPBOX
(WNN) Oslo, NORWAY: Twenty-five Palestinian refugees who managed to escape persecution in Iraq and find their way to Norway they continue to live in harsh conditions after their asylum applications were refused. Some have deportation (‘forced relocation’) orders pending. The Norwegian immigration service based its decision with refusal of these Palestinians on a June 2012 report issued by Norway’s land information branch, stating that Iraq is now considered safe for their return.
The report quotes Mohamed Abu Bakr, charged with managing the file of the Palestinian refugees in Jordan, who said that “the living conditions for Palestinians in Iraq is now much better than it used to be back in 2003.” He added, “Palestinians today have the same citizenship rights as the Iraqis.”
However 2012 has witnessed a significant increase in violence against Iraq’s Palestinians as political conflict intensifies in the wake of the American retreat from Iraq in December 2011 and the rise of the Iraqi security state. Eighty-two attacks against Palestinians in Baghdad were documented during the first five months of 2012 alone — a rate of four attacks a week. It is clear that the Palestinian minority that remains in Iraq continues to be exposed to physical threats and discrimination that is endangering their lives.
These regular attacks on the ground occur in the absence of any official Iraqi action in response. But safety issues aside, could Iraq’s Palestinians actually return to the country?
According to a report issued by the UNHCR advisor on Iraq, on July 26, 2006, about 226 Palestinians successfully escaped from the violent events in Iraq — most of them women and children. They sought asylum in Syria, but were banned from entering and were forced to stay in a camp on the border. Iraqi security forces accused these Palestinians of being terrorists, warning them not to return to Iraq.
A Norwegian land information office report issued in 2011 quotes the former director of Baghdad’s airport saying, “Iraqi authorities refuse to receive Palestinians returning to Iraq whose asylum applications were refused abroad.” The Iraqi embassy in Stockholm, Sweden, confirmed in a telegram made available to Euro-Mid Observer that “Iraq’s Palestinians who left for six months or more are not allowed to go back in.”
Thus, it is clear that the return of Palestinians to Iraq through legal means is not welcomed by Iraqi authorities. Reasons cited for deportation According to refugee testimony given to Euro-Mid Observer, the technical reasons cited by Norwegian authorities for refusing asylum have included:
- Failure of the language test.
- A belief that Iraq is now safe, and that torture no longer occurs.
- A belief that some of the refugees who traveled to Norway via the UAE could find a home there.
It is difficult to find a judicial source for these judgments. In order to obtain the court’s decision, the asylum seeker must sue the immigration service in a civil court and petition for the records to be opened to the public. This process is lengthy as well as expensive;
fling suit in civil court costs the asylum seeker a fee that ranges between $7,000-$10,000. Yet, asylum seekers are typically unemployed, since they are not allowed to hold jobs once their applications are refused.
Note as well that in 2004, Norway stopped issuing temporary work permits for those with expired documents.
The “UAE option”
Of the 25 Palestinian refugees with Iraqi travel documents who have sought asylum in Norway, three traveled via the United Arab Emirates. Thus, the Norwegian immigration service recommended that they return to the UAE. However, their Iraqi travel documents have expired and the UAE Ministry of Interior prohibits the entrance of any foreigner without a valid passport or alternative travel document that allows
him or her to return to the country that issued it.
Although the Palestinian embassy in Oslo could issue a Palestinian passport to these refugees, the document would not allow its holders to return to Palestine – and thus would not satisfy the UAE requirements. Before any deportation is ordered, Norwegian authorities must assure that the refugees will be accepted.
In a document dated May 23, 2012, the UNHCR advised Palestinian refugees not to travel to the UAE unless they have the necessary travel documents.
The future of Iraq’s Palestinians in Norway
When their asylum applications are refused, Palestinian refugees can continue to live in Norway as illegal immigrants. However, they live with the constant threat of attempted deportation to a land that does not welcome them. Living conditions are difficult for illegal immigrants.
According to international and European law, Palestinians who hold Iraqi documents and who were forced by inhumane conditions and persecution to look for asylum may petition UNHCR for protection and assistance. The countries where they seek asylum must provide
secure shelter, “regardless of the matter of their resettlement,” until their final status is determined.
Given the conditions in Iraq documented in this report, the countries where Palestinian refugees seek asylum should consider their applications with sympathy.
Routine medical care is not available to illegal immigrants. With the exception of a new health care clinic in Oslo that is sponsored by a mission church and the Red Cross organization and offers free care to this population, illegal immigrants must rely on health care workers who assist these patients on a charity basis.
Euro-Mid discovered that of the 25 Palestinian refugees from Iraq who are now living in Norway, 11 no longer seek help from the refugee reception centre because they are afraid they will be deported. This fear deprives them of what health care assistance that does exist.
When it comes to housing, it is clear from the testimonies and interviews with NGOs that residential aid is lacking for this population.
Most have to depend on their own meager resources.
Since illegal immigrants are not allowed to work and earn an income, this is next to impossible. Most have to live with friends.
Illegal deportation across Europe
Article No. 33 of the UN agreement on refugees states that “it’s not allowed for any registered country to expel a refugee or deport him to a region where his life or freedom is threatened because of his race, religion, nationality, membership of any particular social group, or political opinions.”
This mandate applies to Palestinians seeking asylum from Iraq.
“So often the world sits idly by, watching ethnic conflicts flare up, as if these were mere entertainment rather than human beings whose lives are being destroyed. Shouldn’t the existence of even one single refugee be a cause for alarm throughout the world?” says genetic science expert, global literacy advocate and Chief of the Ministry of Education in Azerbaijan, Dr. Urkhan Alakbarov.
Dana Ali is a Palestinian immigrant who has been living in Norway for four years. Growing up in an educated family with Palestinian heritage Dana, her sister and mother came to Norway after Dana’s father died. They came to Norway with the idea that the region may be more tolerant to immigrants. Instead they have become trapped within a bureaucratic system that has caused them to live ‘twilight lives’ as paperless members of Norway’s society without the ability to receive legal documentation. This state of limbo for Dana and her family continues today despite years of legal efforts to overturn this situation.
2012 WNN – Women News Network
WNN encourages conversation. All opinions expressed in WNN SOAPBOX belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of WNN – Women News Network. No part of this commentary (op-ed) may be reproduced without prior permissions from WNN &/or the author.